Comm 1000 Signature Assignments

 

Kellas, J. K. (2005). Family Ties: Communicating Identity Through Jointly Told Family Stories. Communication Monographs, 72(4), 365-389.

“Family stories work to construct family identity. Little research, however, has examined storytelling in families. This study examined storytelling content and process to assess the extent to which families jointly integrated or fragmented a shared sense of identity and how these discursive practices relate to family qualities. Results of a study involving 58 family triads indicate relationships between story theme (e.g., accomplishment vs. stress), person referencing practices (e.g., we-ness vs. separateness), and interactional storytelling behaviors (e.g., engagement, turn-taking). Moreover, story framing, perspective-taking, statements about selves-in-the-family, and identifying as a ‘‘storytelling family’’ emerged consistently as positive predictors of family satisfaction and functioning. The results offer a portrait of how families communicate identity and functioning in joint storytelling interactions and further position storytelling as a communication phenomenon worthy of consideration.” (Kellas, 365-389)

 

Fowler, C. (2009). Motives for Sibling Communication Across the Lifespan. Communication Quarterly, 57(1), 51-66.

 

“The sibling bond has the distinction of being the most enduring and egalitarian connection of all family relationships. Unfortunately, although siblings play an important role in one another’s lives, relatively little is known about the communication that characterizes sibling relationships. This study investigated whether the interpersonal communication motives of siblings vary as a function of age or gender. Survey data was provided by 299 respondents aged 18 to 34, 35 to 49, 50 to 64, and 65þ . There were significant differences by both age and gender for several of the communication motives.”

The first article I chose to talk about was “Family Ties: Communicating Identity
Through Jointly Told Family Stories ”.  Out of the two articles we were given to read, this one was the one that I identified the most.  The article describes how storytelling in families creates a culture within the family and how that is the culture that shapes us into who we are when we go out into the world.  I really appreciated how this article illustrated that to the reader when it talked about themes of the stories told within our families.  The stories that are told within our families have themes such as what the family values and how to deal with challenges that arise within each member’s life.  I have found this to be true within my own family.   I will say however, that my family is different than a lot of other families that you are thinking of.  When I think of active storytelling, I think of my wife’s family.  They are definitely active storytellers and we spend hours just talking.  The part of this article that talked about “Shared Joint-Storytelling” is what came to mind while I thought about my in-laws.  Whenever stories are told, it seems like everyone in the family has a little piece of the story to add which causes it to turn out even better.  My family on the other hand, is much different.  I grew up in a household with two wonderful, loving, yet very conservative parents.  My father is quiet and came from a family with a culture much different than the one I grew up with.  The same is true with my mother.  With this being said, Storytelling was a rare occurrence in my household.  My father has always been a mystery to me since he was always so quiet.  If I ever wanted to learn about him I would have to go to my grandmother.  I remember one story in particular where my dad decided to enlist into the Air Force when he was 18 and failed to mention it to his parents.  “I nearly had a heart attack when I found out”, she told me.  I confronted my dad on this and got the full story.  He told me how he had a scout leader who was in the Air Force and it inspired him to want to join and so he did so right after graduating High School.  This had a profound impact on me, mainly because I am now serving in the armed forces.  It made me proud of my dad and helped me understand how much this country meant to him.  This has been instilled into me.  

The conclusion of this article talks about how great the evidence is that family storytelling creates identity within the family.  Having those stories within our families helps build those within the family up rather than breaking them down with negative stories.

The second article I am going to examine is entitled “Motives for Sibling Communication Across the Lifespan”.  This article is really great because it talks about how beneficially it can be to be close to one’s siblings.  One great example that the article gives is how important it is to lean on your siblings after the death of a parent.  I can imagine how that communication can be beneficial especially coming from somebody that is grieving.  I found it really interesting that this article talked about how the older people get, the kinder the siblings get to each other.  This is something I’ve definitely noticed in my own life.  

This article talks a lot about how gender makes a difference when it comes to sibling relations.  It describes how females are more emotional and how males are more closed off with their emotions.  This makes a difference when it you have two sisters compared to two brothers.  The article claims that studies have shown that women are closer than men because of their desire to connect emotionally.

The study in this article was one where they gave a certain amount of people surveys in which they rated their relationship with their siblings and different questions about how they communicate.  The research showed that the biggest reason a sibling would lean on another sibling is for the emotional and intimate aspect of it.  The smallest reason a sibling would seek a helping hand from another sibling is the escape aspect of it.  

If you compare these two articles, you will be able to see how important sibling relations and family storytelling can make a difference in a family.  For example, I gave the example of my wife and her family.  They are always telling stories and they become more colorful as each sibling and family member adds color and content to the story.  Doing so makes the story come to life. My sister always calls me asking if I remember certain things from our childhood such as a family vacation or a birthday party.  We always end up poking fun at our other siblings or looking back with fondness.  Siblings can lean on each other by sharing these stories when they get older and always offer a helping hand when worst comes to worst.  Siblings can also have the strength that they need by learning from stories that our parents tell us so when our parents pass on.  In my opinion, the most important thing that we can take away from these articles is that have a family that tells uplifting stories can build the faith of the individual members in order to take on the challenges outside of the home.  Furthermore, siblings can always rely on each other in the end because in the end they were raised in a culture that they all understand.

 

 

Nathan Mullen

Journalism Signature Assignment

Utah Valley University

April 14, 2017

 

Before I started college, I took the messages that the media were putting out for granted.  I had no idea about the economics, politics, and the different mediums of news sources and had no idea that I was a consumer of these things.  In my young, naive years I would always take everything how it was.  If somebody said something about somebody on the news that was negative, then I would start to formulate an opinion about that person that was negative.  This is where the media can get dangerous.  The media has a form of control on what we think and the messages that are chosen to be reported on are usually the ones that will make stakeholders the most money.  In my paper I hope to discuss these things and how they have impacted reported stories.  The story I chose to write about is the American bombings in Syria.  This story is influenced heavily by politics, visual literacy, and the different mediums in which they are presented.

Visuals always make a big difference when it comes to reporting a story.  I feel like a lot of stories are developed in order to instill fear or confusion within a populous.  The opposite could also be true.  Visuals could be used to inspire.  Vox news reports on the story and has a visual of the war in Syria.  The video shows us how it commenced, the political and social impacts, and who is involved.  This is a very powerful video that was put on the website in order to get an emotional response out of the visitors. Getting an emotional response is one way to win people over to your way of thinking. This tactic is otherwise known as Pathos and is a great communication skill.  The rest of the article goes on to pick apart the history of Assad’s regime and why President Trump’s military action on Syria happened.  From somebody reading this article (talking from personal experience), the pictures of Assad being burned and Obama with a indifferent look on his face really struck me.  It showed me that the people of Syria are people who feel like they deserve basic human rights in which they’re government isn’t willing to provide.  The picture of indifferent President Obama illustrates to me that the writers of this article are casting light on Obama’s “non-intervention”.

One of the things that I love to do when a current event happens is see what foreign news agencies are saying about the topic.  For example, I am a huge fan of BBC news as well as Vice news because of their outside perspective on things.  In a BBC News YouTube broadcast, they talk about the United State’s and the missile attack on an airbase.  They talk about how the Trump administration has seemed to be “disorganized and at times dysfunctional”  from the outside in.  This is a great perspective because we as Americans watch the news everyday and see new things come about from our new Commander in Chief.  The American missiles that were shot at a Syrian air base were a perfect example of how other countries form opinions about America.  The BBC video showed pictures of children in the hospital during the reporting of the event.  To me, it seems like BBC was supportive of the military action because of all those who ended up suffering from the chemical attacks.  The support is generally felt from around the board even inside U.S. newsrooms.  I was really surprised to come across an article on CNBC’s website with a video that showed a great deal of support for the missile attack.  It is a video of experts talking about how it sends a strong message to leaders all around the world that the United States doesn’t mess around.  I think that this is definitely a nationalistic mindset of Americans at this point.

The U.S. Naval strike on the Syrian airfield was such an important event that it was broadcasted over various channels.  These different channels can cause different kinds of effects on the consumers.  A great example of this is the video that I talked about before.  It is one thing to read about children being victims of Assad’s chemical attack, but another to show it on screen.  It’s also one thing to read about the history of the conflict in Syria but another to watch it unfold before you.  I will however, argue that watching President Trump’s press conference about the event was less effective than reading it.  For example, in an article published by USA Today, that exact press conference is quoted to add weight to the story.  The article state the Vivid details:  “Assad choked out the lives of helpless men, women and children. It was a slow and brutal death for so many. Even beautiful babies were cruelly murdered at this very barbaric attack. No child of God should ever suffer such horror.”.  (Brook and Korte, 2017)

As I read through and watched the reports on this story, it was really interesting to explore how different mediums, nationalities, and the visuals used can affect those who read the stories.  In my introduction paragraph I talked a lot about how in my opinion, many stories have been produced only because those who own the media outlet want that story to be reported on.  With that being said, it may be true but I hope I have been able to show you that there are a lot more things that affect the outcome of a story then just economics.  The biggest contributors in my opinion being different mediums, visuals, and the nationalities reporting on the stories.

 

V, T., Brook, E., & Korte, G. (2017, April 08). U.S. launches cruise missile strike on Syria after chemical weapons attack. Retrieved April 15, 2017, from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/04/06/us-launches-cruise-missile-strike-syria-after-chemical-weapons-attack/100142330/

 

  1. (2017, April 07). Syria war: US launches missile strikes in response to ‘chemical attack’ – BBC News. Retrieved April 15, 2017, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SIlp_f6egI&t=83s

 

Ads keep us free. Upgrade to remove. Report this ad.
Cm main logo Popular Styles Title PagePlagiarism CheckerWriting ResourcesContact UsLog In | Register
APA MLA Chicago
Beauchamp, Z. (2017, April 08). The war in Syria, explained. Retrieved April 15, 2017, from http://www.vox.com/2017/4/8/15218782/syria-trump-bomb-assad-explainer

 

Rosenfeld, E. (2017, April 07). Trump launches attack on Syria with 59 Tomahawk missiles. Retrieved April 15, 2017, from http://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/06/us-military-has-launched-more-50-than-missiles-aimed-at-syria-nbc-news.html